XplornetSUCKS  

Go Back   XplornetSUCKS > News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2016, 06:54 PM
buttitchi buttitchi is offline
offline "Global Moderator" Retired
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 213
Arrow Copyright Troll charged with extortion

In the great news today department, the operators of Prenda have been arrested, charged with fraud and extortion.
What copyright troll wants to be next? The legal system is tired of unethical lawyers and companies who are out to earn a buck or millions, by falsifying legal documents, in order to entrap people.
[sadly though: rarely applicable to police and the prosecutor, who would rather not tell you what they faked to convict sweet innocent you, by using the criminal act of 'parallel construction' (illegally gathered or planted evidence to fit the charges) ]

To repeat: Never respond to a notice of copyright infringement that your ISP forwards to you. If you do not respond, you are anonymous. If you respond, you're an idiot, who is easily manipulated by illegal threats.

https://torrentfreak.com/prenda-copy...ortion-161216/
Quote:
For years Prenda Law extracted millions of dollars in cash settlements from alleged BitTorrent pirates, leaving misery in its wake. While the firm no longer exists, two of its principals have now been arrested. The duo have been charged with conspiracy to commit fraud, money laundering, and perjury. Interestingly, The Pirate Bay plays a key role in the case.
Quote:
According to the indictment, the defendants earned millions of dollars in copyright lawsuit settlements from the public, by deceiving state and federal courts all over the country.

“In order to carry out the scheme, the defendants used sham entities to obtain copyrights to pornographic movies-some of which they filmed themselves – and then uploaded those movies to file-sharing websites in order to lure people to download the movies,” the indictment reads.

Through various companies, the goal of the conspiracy was to obtain the identities of alleged file-sharers of their pornographic films. As is common in these cases, that was achieved by obtaining a subpoena to compel ISPs to hand over personal details of subscribers.

This info was then used to extort the accused file-sharers, the Department of Justice alleges.
__________________
Hi Diddly Ho, Good Neighborino
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.